What History Got Right: Sales Forecasting

Jul 13, 2022 | Podcast

Sales Forecasting
Audio Podcast

 

While reading and studying books and magazines on sales leadership from the late 1800s through the 1940s:
The problems of sales & leadership are almost all the same today…except for one thing. There are no articles, or even expressions of consternation, about forecasting in sales back then. I think I put my finger on why – and while it might not solve all of our forecasting issues, there’s a core question that should strike everyone who listens…

Why do we try to predict when a buyer will buy via forecasts and stages that are based on seller activities?

100 years ago, their processes NEVER were “discovery”, “qualification”, “demo”, “proposal”, “close’. Never. Listen in to what was the basis of EVERY sales process and forecasting methodology 100 years ago…a systemic recognition of buyer behavior.

Other Podcasts You Might Enjoy

Early 1900s Sales Hiring: Timeless, or Taboo?

Early 1900s Sales Hiring: Timeless, or Taboo?

Early 1900s Sales Hiring: Timeless, or Taboo? We believe we know today the traits it takes to be a successful salesperson, but do we? In the early 1900s, while many of the thoughts were the same as today, there was some "off-limits" thinking as well. In this...

read more
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Sales Hasn’t Changed

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Sales Hasn’t Changed

Episode #50! Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Sales Hasn’t Changed In this, the 50th episode of The Sales History Podcast, I step into the role of prosecuting attorney to put one bold claim on trial: that the sales profession has changed dramatically in the past decade. My...

read more

0 Comments

Todd Caponi
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.